Skip to main content

This translation is provided for general access and has no recorded medical-language review.

Editorial general information — not a clinical-review record

Published: Updated: Publisher: Dr. Murat Toktamışoğlu

What does the FDA safety communication on RF microneedling say?

In 2025 the FDA reported burns, scarring, fat loss, disfigurement and nerve damage; reports do not measure personal incidence or prove causality. One label may cover different devices, needle depths, energy, contents and protocols; studies cannot be treated as directly equivalent.

This translation has no recorded clinical or medical-language review.

Direct answer

  • In 2025 the FDA reported burns, scarring, fat loss, disfigurement and nerve damage; reports do not measure personal incidence or prove causality.
  • One label may cover different devices, needle depths, energy, contents and protocols; studies cannot be treated as directly equivalent.
  • Ask for the exact device, intended use, Turkish registration, needle and energy settings, operator training and adverse-event plan.

How should this topic be assessed?

In 2025 the FDA reported burns, scarring, fat loss, disfigurement and nerve damage; reports do not measure personal incidence or prove causality. One label may cover different devices, needle depths, energy, contents and protocols; studies cannot be treated as directly equivalent. Online information cannot replace an examination-based decision about personal suitability or outcome.

What should be clarified in consultation?

Ask for the exact device, intended use, Turkish registration, needle and energy settings, operator training and adverse-event plan. The goal, alternatives, the option of no procedure, material risks, follow-up and urgent warning signs should also be discussed.

Scope of this article

This content is not diagnosis, prescribing, personal risk assessment or a treatment plan. Sources may be limited to a particular product, device, task, indication or study group.

Sources and evidence limits

These links are editorial starting points used to examine the article's boundaries.

  1. Microneedling for Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review

    Foppiani JA et al. · 2025

    Scope and limitations: Interpret this source only within the exact product, device, method, indication and study population it names. It does not establish personal suitability, Turkish authorization, a universal protocol or a guaranteed outcome; consult the full source and current local information.

    Editorial source — not a signed clinical review

  2. Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Radiofrequency for Face and Neck Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review

    Austin GK, Struble SL, Quatela VC · 2022

    Scope and limitations: Interpret this source only within the exact product, device, method, indication and study population it names. It does not establish personal suitability, Turkish authorization, a universal protocol or a guaranteed outcome; consult the full source and current local information.

    Editorial source — not a signed clinical review

  3. Energy-Based Devices for the Treatment of Facial Skin Conditions in Skin of Color

    Sanyal RD, Fabi SG · 2024

    Scope and limitations: Interpret this source only within the exact product, device, method, indication and study population it names. It does not establish personal suitability, Turkish authorization, a universal protocol or a guaranteed outcome; consult the full source and current local information.

    Editorial source — not a signed clinical review

  4. Potential Risks with Certain Uses of Radiofrequency (RF) Microneedling – FDA Safety Communication

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) · 2025

    Scope and limitations: Interpret this source only within the exact product, device, method, indication and study population it names. It does not establish personal suitability, Turkish authorization, a universal protocol or a guaranteed outcome; consult the full source and current local information.

    Editorial source — not a signed clinical review

  5. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Satisfaction Rates of Laser Combination Treatments vs Laser Monotherapy in Skin Rejuvenation Resurfacing

    Pour Mohammad A et al. · 2023

    Scope and limitations: Interpret this source only within the exact product, device, method, indication and study population it names. It does not establish personal suitability, Turkish authorization, a universal protocol or a guaranteed outcome; consult the full source and current local information.

    Editorial source — not a signed clinical review

  6. Medical Lasers

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) · 2023

    Scope and limitations: Interpret this source only within the exact product, device, method, indication and study population it names. It does not establish personal suitability, Turkish authorization, a universal protocol or a guaranteed outcome; consult the full source and current local information.

    Editorial source — not a signed clinical review

  7. Ürün Takip Sistemi (ÜTS) — Tıbbi Cihaz ve Firma Sorgulama

    T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı / Türkiye İlaç ve Tıbbi Cihaz Kurumu (TİTCK) · 2016

    Scope and limitations: Interpret this source only within the exact product, device, method, indication and study population it names. It does not establish personal suitability, Turkish authorization, a universal protocol or a guaranteed outcome; consult the full source and current local information.

    Editorial source — not a signed clinical review